BevBlog: Novelty beverages — there has to be a point

Drops, drips, and leaks from the beverage industry.

Posted in Uncategorized

One thing that has always boggled my mind are companies whose product portfolio consists entirely of novelty products. I’m talking about sexually explicit labels/names, glow in the dark packaging, licensed products, gimmick flavors, etc.

Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, but making a successful beverage business relies on repeat sales. Making a REALLY successful beverage business, like a Hansen or Glaceau, requires making a LOT of repeat sales. It needs to be available for purchase by the case at places like club stores.

Novelty products are generally not available in mainstream retail channels (cstores, grocery, etc) and are instead left with non-traditional retail channels….like, say, Spencer Gifts. Novelty products are often purchased once and, in many cases, are not consumed but rather placed on someone’s desk or in the window of their dorm room. (We have a pretty nice collection of energy drinks and Skeleteens Sodas in our office)

For example, consider “Sum Poosie Energy Drink“. This is a product that in my opinion is initially purchased due to shock value or humor. Consumers do not make repeat purchases or buy it by the case. The best chance for success for this brand is in on-premise venues, but given this brand’s sexually oriented branding, Sum Poosie will struggle to translate this into higher volume channels. Furthermore, if the product were to actually spread due to shock value, it would eventually get the point where the shock value wears off. This is the very definition of “novelty”. Everyone has covered it and it’s no longer to cool to have a bottle in your dorm window. Then what?

Using a novelty product to launch a company is OK, assuming it’s just your “foot in the door”. Novelty products like Sum Poosie often get free PR that cannot be bought with the resources of a small company….But unless your only goal is to produce a short-lived punch line, the trick is figuring out how to build the free PR into something that is commercially viable and has staying power.

Unfortunately, I can’t think of an example where a company has actually done this :( Probably the closest example is Jones Soda, which used novelty to try and bolster its existing brand. It’s still my opinion that the “Jones Soda” name was lost in much of the PR.

So, my question for the bevblogosphere is, are all novelty products one-trick ponies? If Jones can’t create a major upswing from its PR line, can anyone? Your comments are appreciated….

This entry was posted on Friday, May 26th, 2006 at 9:12 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 5 responses to “Novelty beverages — there has to be a point”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On May 26th, 2006, Anonymous said:

    This is the new way to burn money.
    I believe there are 2 categories of people involved in this business. The first have made money in other industries (real estate, etc.). The second have no money, have taken home equity loan and work two other jobs to pay bills.
    Both categories are newcomers to the industry – just because beverages are hot right now!
    I think they are good for the industry (R&D, packaging and other material, bottlers, etc.) as far as they are able to pay their bills.

    There is no point whatsoever! (at least for us in the beverage industry…)

  2. 2 On May 27th, 2006, Anonymous said:

    Look for the next product from this brand: Sum Poosie Juice – to quench the thirst of disabled consumers and those on a special diet. I really hope it’s unsweetened and with no flavors added.
    If there is no point we still can have fun…

  3. 3 On May 29th, 2006, Anonymous said:

    The best chance for success for this brand is in on-premise venues…

    And even that would be limited primarily to strip clubs.

  4. 4 On May 31st, 2006, Anonymous said:

    These shock-value drinks may backfire on those who choose to drink them. For example, I heard one woman at a single’s bar who was offended by a man asking for Sum Poosie. He told her if she didn’t want Sum Poosie she might rather have a Dickens Cider.

  5. 5 On July 27th, 2006, Anonymous said:

    don’t forget about the Novelty who is pushing it.. http://www.sexkola.com/drvmov

Leave a Reply

Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.




Headlines

Industry News