View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2008, 09:59 AM
boy scout boy scout is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greg View Post
I accept that the potency issue is an important one. In my opinion I would not object to showing age identification for a drink that has over 200-250 mg in it.( Total per bottle) If adults want to use a drink that has 200+mg of caffeine in it then they should be able to buy it.


And I don't even need to tell you about my position about ED companies that come out with drug names or common drug alternative/slang names for their drink.
It'll be interesting to see what the Fed's do in the next year or two. With adverse event reporting being mandatory for all supplement manufacturers - not to mention the major increase & focus the media are drawing to these events, it's just a matter of time 'til the Government has enough "facts" to regulate. We saw this happen with ephedra, and it looks like the process to regulate has started with ED's.
Reply With Quote