popologist
12-19-2005, 06:57 AM
ok. hear me out. ;)
what if coke classic went back on sugar?
the change would definitely get lots of media attention, and, i think, it would be 100% POSITIVE, since they're reformulating to a "superior" ingredient.
of course, coke would have to charge a bit more for the product (i'm not quite sure what the margins would be), but... doing so would re-establish coke as the "premier" (or high-end) cola, and would renew A LOT of interest in the brand.
basically, coke would be putting the "classic" back in coca-cola.
i suppose, they could also keep the HFCS version and call it something else, like... "coca-cola cousin"... LOL! but that might defeat the whole purpose.
anyway... would adding sugar (and, most likely, increasing the price) be suicide for their market share and stock price, or could this be a change that could only reap rewards?
[ 12-19-2005, 06:58 AM: Message edited by: popologist ]
what if coke classic went back on sugar?
the change would definitely get lots of media attention, and, i think, it would be 100% POSITIVE, since they're reformulating to a "superior" ingredient.
of course, coke would have to charge a bit more for the product (i'm not quite sure what the margins would be), but... doing so would re-establish coke as the "premier" (or high-end) cola, and would renew A LOT of interest in the brand.
basically, coke would be putting the "classic" back in coca-cola.
i suppose, they could also keep the HFCS version and call it something else, like... "coca-cola cousin"... LOL! but that might defeat the whole purpose.
anyway... would adding sugar (and, most likely, increasing the price) be suicide for their market share and stock price, or could this be a change that could only reap rewards?
[ 12-19-2005, 06:58 AM: Message edited by: popologist ]