THe problem with Zero has never been the product- which is top notch- the real issue is that Coke owns the diet soda market. DC is oupasing Diet Pepsi yearly as well and so that gap is only growing. In essence Zero is a solution looking for a problem- atleast a this point. Splitting DC drinkers dilutes the brand and forces Coke to have to market, and maintain two seperate lines. Lets not forget that Coke must literally have thousands of bottles of champaign in the freezer awaiting the time the DC overtakes Pepsi. Still all indications are that Coke will continue to expand the brand and that it will grow incrementally. The key to Zero is that it can attract Pepsi drinkers and men- so far I think they need to play more heavily to those markets cuz thats where the money is- otherwise Zero will only grow to the detriment of DC. Coke knows they have a winner though and you wouldnt believe the amount of jokes I have heard comparing Zero to PepsiOne- One sells half as well as Zero at best and Pepsi has literally dumped 5-10x the amount of money on One with no success-
<b>Hey Pepsi, Shasta called, they want their lemon-lime back.</b>