BevNET.com - The Beverage Industry's Source For Product Reviews, News, and More
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Pepsi Natural

  1. #21
    Mr Zabe's Avatar
    Mr Zabe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Chicago,IL
    Posts
    4,536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim. View Post
    No I mean even people like my parents. They probably don't care. Like at all.
    Yeah, so true my Dad enjoys soda pop but he thinks I'm goofy
    for getting so crazy over cane sweetened soda pop. LOL To him sweet is sweet. LMAO
    Don't worry, be happy. Meher Baba

  2. #22
    mjb1124 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Brunswick, NJ
    Posts
    744

    Default

    I recently brought up the Pepsi and Dew throwbacks to some of my friends, and their reaction was pretty much "um, okay". But as for me, I'll be all over these!

  3. #23
    Android's Avatar
    Android is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Douglas, WY
    Posts
    1,184

    Default

    FYI:

    In his book about the Cola Wars in the 1980s, Former Pepsi president and later CEO Roger Enrico talked about Pepsi's decision to change to HFCS. There's about 2 or 3 pages in the book about it, actually. What it boiled down to was both Coke and Pepsi transitioned over time, first a mixture of HFCS and sugar then totally switching to HFCS. Coke did it first, starting the process around 1980. Pepsi wouldn't though, because the quality of HFCS at the time messed up the taste too much. Coke's formula apparantly was more forgiving when mixed with corn sludge than Pepsi.... and then-current-Pepsi-CEO Don Kendall could taste the difference, and he wasn't about to mess with the Pepsi "crown jewels" in that manner. However, Pepsi did put pressure on the corn industry to come up with a better product, which apparantly they did. The final blow for Pepsi switching to sugar was the fact that Coke was saving millions of dollars a year by then, by using corn sweetener, money that was going into the marketing side of the Cola Wars, trying to catch up to Pepsi's lead in supermarkets, and putting Pepsi at a big disadvantage. Pepsi stood to gain like $120 million a year in 1983 just by switching to 50% HFCS....

    During 1980, Coke went to 50/50% mix HFCS/sugar. In 1983, Pepsi went to a 50/50 mix. At that time, Coke changed their fountain mix from 50/50 to 75/25 corn/sugar. A year later, they went 75/25 in cans/bottles and 100% corn sludge in fountains. That's as far as the book says (book was written in 1986) so I'm not sure when they both went to 100% corn sweetener.

    Anyway, I agree that a lot of people probably don't care about the sweetener as long as it's "sweet". But I know that I could definately tell a difference back when I was buying returnables from the last two Pepsi bottlers in the US - Davenport Iowa and Memphis Missouri - the former used sugar and the latter used HFCS. The sugar sweetened stuff was much much better. At the time I don't believe I knew Davenport used sugar, as the caps said "and/or" on them, I only learned that after I joined this board. But I did know there was a decidedly noticable difference in taste.

    -Andy
    Last edited by Android; 03-27-2009 at 06:15 PM.
    Give me some cane sugar Pepsi in a glass bottle!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

©1996-2011 BevNET.com®, Inc. (legal terms)
44 Pleasant St., Suite 110, Watertown, MA 02472  Tel: 617-715-9670 | Fax: 617-876-1279
Beverage Spectrum | Brewbound.com | BarsAreFood.com | Survey Software | Online Survey Software


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 1