Again? I suppose this can't be any worse than the formula they have now. This actually sounds a lot like the description used for the formula prior to the current one when it was introduced.
Although I didn't think that version was bad (certainly better than the current one), I wish they would just bring back the 1950-97 formula. I think they've only damaged the brand by incessantly reformulating the product.
- Community
- Magazine
- Jobs
- Events
- Videos
- Reviews
- Reviews
- Featured Reviews Sorted chronologically from newest to oldest.
- Browse By Category Browse products by product type.
- Most Popular Product listings from most to least viewed.
- View All All of our product reviews, A to Z.
- Submit Product for Review Want BevNET.com to review your product? It's free. Sign up here.
- News
- News
- Top News Top stories, news, interviews, & product reviews.
- Newswire Press releases and news briefs.
- Supplier News Product development & manufacturing news.
- Craft Beer News Craft beer news at our sister site, Brewbound.com
- Best Of 2011 BevNET's annual beverage industry awards.
- Submit News Send us news, press releases, and anonymous tips.





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote



