This thread is never going to end.

So you believe that Coke and Pepsi are all about taste (which probably explains why they spends hundreds of millions of $$$ in marketing and never mention taste!) and that our review was unfair since Sum Poosie tastes good (which was cited, fwiw!). Going to go out on a limb here, but it sounds like you need to learn a thing or two about BRANDING and the power of it relative to major consumer products. You are foolish to think that it has no impact on the purchase decision....If that were the case, why do all these products have brands in the first place?? Why not just put them in blank bottles/cans with stick on labels? Come on!

In the case of Sum Poosie, you have a brand that's not mainstream, which is due in part to the choice of name. It's not that we're offended by the name, it's honestly just that we believe that SP's sexual innuendo creates a product that is unappetizing...Most people won't want to put things in theor mouth that -- whether intended or not (we won't debate that) -- have a strong sexual image.

Again, it has nothing to do with being offended, it has to do with the fact that this is ultimately an edible item that one consumes and puts in their mouth.

Finally, you can't change people's opinions about your product. You disagree with ours and that's fine. However, to call it unfair because you wanted a review that was based on your own rules and criteria...now that's unfair to everyone else who we've ever reviewed.

This is where it ends...This topic is being closed. Nothing else to say.