Zabe,
I see your point about dollars and profit.
A big box retailer relies on volume for his profits, therefore he will make less per case to sell more volume. However, he takes ownership of the product and sets it on a pallet on the aisle. The big box does no alternative advertising to sell more product, therefore his volume can be stifled. Sure, he will get the small mom and pops to buy at his discounted rate but his volume will remain flat.
A distributor has a very entrenched motive to go out there and push every single case he can. The greater the brand grows the greater volume the distributor will have and thereby create greater revenue. The distributor will place POP/POS, will create demand by price fluctuations, promotions, sampling. The Distributor has a greater need and desire to move as much product as possible. The distributor takes ownership seriously and makes it his sole purpose to get it out the door as quickly as possible.
To get back to your question: IMO The duistributor does have higher margn needs than the big box retailer. The dist has greater overhead than a big box. The distributor relies on one segment to make maoney(inthis case drinks) while the big box can rely on on Big Ticket items ( TV's. Refridgerators, Jewelry, etc) to offset lower margins on ohther products.
Furthermore, I bet you a dollar to a donut that AB made it part of the deal to not sell Monster in CostCo or Sams Clubs or the likes unless AB wanted to do it.
Whether you think can or think you can\'t, you\'re probably right!