Logic, for what its worth in the beverage industry, dictates that if Starbucks is/was to bring in an established energy brand it would be a Pepsi product. The cross marketing of Starbucks Espresso shot with Pepsi more than likely suggest a relationship already exist to move forward with an energy drink.
My take is that anyone who routinely goes into a starbucks and buys a Grande coffee and then switches to an AMP is backing up. Furthermore, would Starbucks be competitive in pricing. What about the risk of turning on customers to new products that they can get elsewhere cheaper?
I further think that Howard Shultz may be denying the fact that a $3 + cup of coffee may be one of the first things a consumer drops when money gets tight. Why pay $3+ for a cup of coffee that I can make at home for pennies???? Then I can dress it up with whatever I like. ( Although I am an old fashioned "black" coffee drinker).
The mortgage payment is set, the car payment is set, the utility bills, phone, insurance, etc are pretty much set on a monthly basis. Of course the consumer is going to cut costs where it is easiest and most expedient on the bottom line.
Last edited by greg; 03-21-2008 at 09:25 AM.
Whether you think can or think you can\'t, you\'re probably right!