BevNET Magazine

The New Distribution Landscape Part 2

NEWView the print version of this article

BY GERRY KHERMOUCH

LAST ISSUE I MADE THE PERHAPS counterintuitive case that distribution options for fledgling non-alcoholic beverage brands actually may be on the rise, even in a broader landscape where wholesale and retail consolidation continue unabated. Entrepreneurs, sometimes from outside the beverage industry, are launching new houses. Beer wholesalers, their core beer brands plateauing, are being driven to reconsider participation in NAs, despite the complications these bring to their business models. And the parallel DSD system, that delivers milk, yogurt and other dairy products to retailers, also is beginning to migrate to shelf-stable (they like to say “ambient”) items. But that’s not the entire extent of the trend. Here are a few other options that have been developing:

 

The Red Bull network.  With Red Bull’s own efforts to diversify its portfolio via line extensions like Red Bull Cola and shots and new brands like Carpe Diem not having panned out, some exclusive Red Bull houses such as Beverage Works in the New York/New Jersey area have set up separate operations to take on a select number of outside brands. At the same time, quite a few exclusive houses that have been terminated by Red Bull – not always for cause – have gotten a new lease on life by building portfolios of other brands, aided by the Red Bull aura of sharp execution. Former Red Bull shops in the Bay Area (Geyser), Ohio (Buckeye) and Florida (Sand Dollar) are among those that seem to be succeeding now as diversified houses.

 

Soft drink bottlers.  Though Coke and Pepsi now own the vast majority of their bottling systems, the remaining independents are getting more aggressive about plugging portfolio gaps with intriguing new brands. My theory on that is that, with the government having given them a free pass on the big bottler deals, Coke and Pepsi realize it wouldn’t look good for them to start pounding on the little guys, and the little guys know that.  So they’re picking up more outside brands and in many cases doing a good job with them, without neglecting their core brands. I won’t name names here, because that seems to only get them in hot water, but trust me, they’re out there.

All other.  Distributors of snacks, candy, deli meats, tobacco, even charcoal – they all reach the same accounts beverage companies need, often without the distraction of other beverage brands in the portfolio. Ingenuity in cultivating them can pay big dividends.

I should also mention a pair of other trends that are helping strengthen the independent system. One involves efforts by Coke to employ indie shops as incubators of its own early-stage brands. For instance, houses like Big Geyser in New York, Crescent in New Jersey and Haralambos in LA have played an adept hand moving Illycaffe into the right retail accounts. A lot of us figure it’s only a matter of time before Pepsi takes a similar enlightened view. Both, by the way, also have been subbing some of their core brands to indies to reach the small retailers that have dropped off the radar of their bottling systems. For indie houses who’ve long regarded Coke and Pepsi as monolithic enemies, this new era of “co-opetition” is a bracing divergence.

Also bearing notice are attempts to weave independent houses into a more cohesive network that can meet the needs of major chains. The once-informal Northeast Independent Distributors Association has been doing this in a more concerted way, and Abarta’s GTG unit garners a lot of credit for putting fast-growing Calypso lemonade in the right houses. Coast Brands Group has been rolling out its concept eastward from its West Coast base. And Bud and Miller/Coors houses in some states have banded together to offer full coverage to select brands.

Considering that many of us have long regarded independent DSD as a vanishing species, this is all quite a remarkable turn of events. It’s too early to say how sustainable these varied approaches will prove, but the trend should offer hope to beverage entrepreneurs that their brands will be able to find an effective route to retail.

 

Longtime beverage-watcher Gerry Khermouch is executive editor of Beverage Business Insights, a twice-weekly e-newsletter covering the nonalcoholic beverage sector.

 

 

Comments

  • Nextleveldist

    I’m not sure where you got your information but from where I see it in Pennsylvania. ABARTA is only out for one thing. THEMSELVES!! They don’t work with the small DSD companies and in fact like to stick it to the smaller guy rather then work with them. Years ago when ABARTA was a powerhouse  they were going thru many changes when a General Manager as well as a Home Market Manager were charged with several violations from trans-shipping to stealing the companies product and profit. The 2 powerhouse owners (Bitzer & Weinstein) drained everything out of the company to leave it a non agressive company. The competitors saw this and took every advantage in the market place and left people with the Coca-Cola could care less about us any more.   Pepsi also has the screw the little guy thoughts as well. That goes back to the days of Tom McQueh,  Both companies attitudes show us why to NEVER trust who and what they stand for. How can the small DSD company beat the 2 Mega Companies in the Off Premise market when they’re out throwqing thousands of dollars at the stores buying up shelf and cooler space. Knocking out the little guy. Couple that with the deals and kick backs they throw at the Major chain stores where they can sell products lower then the Mom & Pop stores can buy it direct from them.

    As for the beer side, Companies like Banko Beverage, Geiger Beverage & Allentown Beverage are just as big of rats.. For as long as I have been in the beverage industry (30+ years) Companies like these have been mainly on premise. With money being as tight as it is. They are now looking and doing more with the Off Premise side of the business. Some even have a N/A division where they are selling Iced Teas, Energy Drinks, Water etc..And what are they doing.. Killing the little DSD guys…There was a time when companies like Arizona, Hanson Beverage, Apple & Eve, Red Bull, looked to the small DSD companies to move their product. No they move to companies such as Davis Beverage, Banko Beverage, Geiger Beverage to manage sales. I have seen more Little guys go out of business because of this thought process.. So your reporting is nothing close to truth.. All these companies care about is the US Dollar and how they can get it..And screw the little guy. They forget.. They were once in the little guys shoes too….Like the saying goes, “You have to know where you’ve been, to know where your going”.

    SO you need to re-think your program Gary and report the facts..

Have news? Have a new product? Tell us