High Voltage Beverages sues Coca-Cola over Vault name

Posted: 9/22/2008 3:15 PM  7 Comments |  Email
Tagged Companies: High Voltage Beverages, Inc. | Coca Cola Company

Bookmark and Share

ADVERTISEMENT

By Matt Casey, Assistant Editor

A small beverage company has filed a trademark suit against Coca-Cola and asked a judge to order the beverage giant to remove Vault from the market.
High Voltage Beverages LLC produces Volt - primarily caffeine-enhanced sports drinks – and alleges that Vault violates their trademark because the two words sound and appear similar. Their suit, filed August 12 in the U.S. district court for the Western district of North Carolina, asks that Coke render any profits from Vault to HVB, remove Vault from the market, transfer drinkvault.com to HVB and pay for the costs of an advertising campaign to correct any confusion between the two products.

Coca-Cola did not return a request for comment on the suit, but the company could be in a tough spot, according to trademark attorney Gregg Sultan.

Sultan said courts tend to favor the plaintiff in cases involving products sold in convenience stores because, in that venue, “people aren’t thinking that much.”

Sultan said that even though Coca-Cola has used the Vault trademark since 2005, HVB filed an application for the Volt trademark in 1997 and obtained a registration for it in 2007. Therefore, if the court determines that the trademarks are confusingly similar, Coca-Cola may be forced to remove its product from the market. Additionally, Sultan said that although the names appear and sound similar, they are both dictionary words with different meanings.

“It could be a very interesting case actually,” Sultan said.

Recently-named president of HVB Bill Sipper called this a case of a big beverage company that “tried to just beat up a little guy,” and said he felt confident in his company’s chances to win the suit.

“We wouldn’t have filed it if we didn’t think it would succeed,” Sipper said.

Source: BevNET.com Staff

Give me a break! The way the law works here is simple:
1. Who has "priority rights"? i.e.- who filed for the trademark first? It doesn't make any difference who gets their product to market first.

2. Ask your self- VOLT VAULT VOLT VAULT... Sound confusing to me...

3. Coca-Cola has plenty of lawyers. One would think that at least one of them might have done enough research to see if there was another similar brand name out there before making multi-million dollar product launch. This information is a matter of public record easily available online...

BTW- the courts NEVER allow side by side comparisons in confusingly similar trademark cases, as shown here precisely because such comparisons higlight the differences between the two, not how they are similar. The real world doesn't work that way... I'm no lawyer but wouldn't want to be on Coke's side of this argument...

IP Address: 75.197.27.143 | Report This Comment

They better have some serious cash to pay Coke. There is a precedent case that HVB should have examined before taking this before the courts. Ting a Jamaican drink was sued by the makers of Tang along similar grounds. Tang lost. HVB you were badly served by your lawyers.

IP Address: 63.17.181.152 | Report This Comment

Not so fast, Jamey --- size has nothing to do with this legal dogfight. Trademark laws exist to help protect the entrepreneur, the little guy, the individual inventor and, yes, even the HUGE company that first staked their claim at the trademark office. Since VOLT was on the register way before BEFORE Coke ever came out with Vault, that gives VOLT something called "priority rights". It will be tough to overcome that legal hurdle if you are COKE. As long as HVB wasn't just laying in the bushes for a decade with a sniper rifle waiting to shoot at some careless -- or just plain dumb -- trademark violator, VOLT will win this one. (My bet, anyway! Googling "Volt drinks" shows me that they're the real McCoy and not just warehousing their trademark!) Yea, they're small but so was Vitamin Water 8 years ago.

Anyway glad to see someone in this biz has the balls (or insanity?) to take on the BIG RED ONE.

volt vault volt vault. Yea, sounds like a bit of confusion going on to my way of thinking.

You and I may differ on how we view this, but eventually a jury of waitresses, truck drivers, accountants, teachers and/or unemployed folks will decide what's confusing and what isn't.

IP Address: 170.170.59.139 | Report This Comment

You got to be kidding me. Volt and Vault; HVB profits must be in trouble. If you can't beat them, sue them.

I think it is all over for HVB at this point.

IP Address: 63.200.214.188 | Report This Comment

This is ridiculous. Vault is named after a type of toilet, nothing at all related to energy.

IP Address: 12.86.107.34 | Report This Comment

This is a stupid case. Anyone with half a brain could figure that Volt and Vault are different products by looking at them, as the logos are completely different. Volt looks like a generic version of Vault. Has Mountain Dew sued Safeway for the similar sounding Mountain Breeze? No. Could Jolt sue Volt if Volt somehow sucessfully sues Coke over Volt? Hmm...Both are high energy drinks. Jolt Volt Jolt Volt Jolt. Sounds similar. Everyone knows Jolt has been on the market a lot longer. Coke is going to have the the best lawyers in the world...and a weak case against them. This will be an easy case for them to win, and a waste of money for the makers of Volt. I'll be rooting for Big Red on this one.

IP Address: 66.215.63.10 | Report This Comment

Oh, and will the makers of Volt try to sue GM over the name of the upcoming Chevy Volt? Gimme me a break!

IP Address: 66.215.63.10 | Report This Comment

Leave a comment

name:

email:

comment:

Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.