Senator Urges FDA to Investigate Energy Drinks

In recent years Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) has pushed for increased oversight of the food, beverage and supplement industry on many fronts; yesterday he sent a letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg to investigate the caffeine content in energy drinks.

Durbin said the letter came after he learned the story of 14 year-old Anais Fournier, who died last December of a cardiac arrhythmia due to caffeine toxicity after drinking two 24 oz. Monster energy drinks over a 24-hour period.

Fournier’s mother has been actively telling her daughter’s story since then and is pushing for increased legislative action and parental awareness concerning energy drinks.

“Consuming large quantities of caffeine can have serious health consequences, including caffeine toxicity, stroke, anxiety, arrhythmia, and in some cases death. Young people are especially susceptible to suffering adverse effects because energy drinks market to youth, their bodies are not accustomed to caffeine, and energy drinks contain high levels of caffeine and stimulating additives that may interact when used in combination,” wrote Durbin in his letter to Hamburg. “The glossy marketing tailored to youth has worked — 30 to 50 percent of adolescents report consuming energy drinks.”

Durbin contends that while many energy drinks are marketed as dietary supplements, the FDA does have the ability to enforce caffeine limits and additives in the products if they are being sold as beverages.

“Most energy drinks are currently marketed as dietary supplements, therefore they do not need to establish evidence of their products’ safety or adhere to a limit on the level of caffeine. At the same time, many energy drinks come in single-use containers ranging from 8oz to 32oz and are marketed like beverages. Rockstar Energy Drink’s website says, ‘enjoy this fully refreshing lightly carbonated beverage.’” he wrote.  “If the FDA makes a determination that energy drinks are beverages with high levels of caffeine and additives that raise safety concerns, the agency would have the authority to limit the level of caffeine and require the manufacturers to provide scientific evidence that ingredients such as guarana, taurine, and ginseng are safe for their intended use and in combination with caffeine and other energy drink ingredients.”

Full text of Sen. Durbin’s letter follows:

April 3, 2012

The Honorable Margaret Hamburg

Commissioner

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

10903 Hampshire Avenue

Silver Spring, MD 20093

 

Dear Commissioner Hamburg:

I am calling on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to take regulatory action to address the rising health concerns around energy drinks.

Energy drinks with names like Monster Energy, Red Bull, Rockstar, Full Throttle, and AMP are now common fixtures in grocery stores, vending machines, and convenience stores. These products target young people claiming to increase attention, stamina, performance, and weight loss. The website for Monster Energy Drink claims to deliver “twice the buzz of a regular energy drink…and the big bad buzz you know and love.” Rockstar Energy Drink claims “to provide an incredible energy boost for those who lead active and exhausting lifestyles.” The glossy marketing tailored to youth has worked – 30 to 50 percent of adolescents report consuming energy drinks.

However, a recent report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) shows that energy drinks pose potentially serious health risks. The report found that between 2005 – 2009, the number of emergency room (ER) visits due to energy drinks increased ten-fold from 1,128 to 13,114 visits.

A major factor contributing to these hospitalizations is the exceptionally high levels of caffeine in energy drinks. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, adolescents should not consume more than 100mg of caffeine daily. One 16oz can of Monster contains 160mg of caffeine, which is equivalent to almost 5 cans of soda. However, this caffeine level does not account for caffeine from additives, like guarana, or ingredients with stimulating properties, like taurine and ginseng.

Consuming large quantities of caffeine can have serious health consequences, including caffeine toxicity, stroke, anxiety, arrhythmia, and in some cases death. Young people are especially susceptible to suffering adverse effects because energy drinks market to youth, their bodies are not accustomed to caffeine, and energy drinks contain high levels of caffeine and stimulating additives that may interact when used in combination.

The FDA has the authority to regulate caffeine levels in soft drinks to .02 percent or less of the product – about 71mg in a 12oz soda. The agency also has the authority to regulate additives in beverages to ensure they are safe for their intended use and when used in combination with other ingredients.

Most energy drinks are currently marketed as dietary supplements, therefore they do not need to establish evidence of their products’ safety or adhere to a limit on the level of caffeine. At the same time, many energy drinks come in single-use containers ranging from 8oz to 32oz and are marketed like beverages. Rockstar Energy Drink’s website says, “enjoy this fully refreshing lightly carbonated beverage.”

If the FDA makes a determination that energy drinks are beverages with high levels of caffeine and additives that raise safety concerns, the agency would have the authority to limit the level of caffeine and require the manufacturers to provide scientific evidence that ingredients such as guarana, taurine, and ginseng are safe for their intended use and in combination with caffeine and other energy drink ingredients.

The distinction between dietary supplements and foods with dietary ingredient additives is not always clear, leaving room for some food and beverage products to be marketed as dietary supplements in order to circumvent the safety standards required for food additives. I urge the FDA to clarify the definition of conventional foods and its authority to oversee the safety of foods, including energy drinks, containing dietary supplement ingredients.

I also ask the agency to investigate energy drinks like Monster Energy, Rockstar, and Full Throttle to ensure they are not in fact conventional foods, based on the FDA’s 2009 “Guidance for Industry: Factors that Distinguish Liquid Supplements from Beverages.” According to the draft guidance, beverages can be distinguished from liquid supplements based on factors such as the volume in which they are intended to be consumed, product or brand name, labeling, advertising, and packing as a single or multiple use beverage.

I also ask the FDA to enforce its regulatory authority over the caffeine levels in energy drinks, including Red Bull and AMP currently marketed as beverages, and to investigate caffeine levels in energy drinks marketed as supplements.

Finally, I urge the FDA to address the safety concerns posed by additives in energy drinks by requiring manufacturers to provide scientific evidence that ingredients, such as guarana, taurine, and ginseng, are safe for their intended used and when used in combination with other ingredients and caffeine.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

Richard J. Durbin

  • Pingback: Energy drink or supplement? Enforce your own guidance, says Sen Durbin to FDA – FoodNavigator-USA.com | Trends Medical and Calvin - Medical News Magazine

  • Sillystuff

    I sure hope MR. Durbin addresses the ‘evil’ drug coffee and its “pushers” like Starbucks with the same vigor.  I see just as many Starbucks cups glued to the hands of our adolescents as I do energy drinks.  There has to me some “real” governing to be done somewhere.

  • Bob

    Come on. A 24 oz Monster only has 240 mg of caffeine. A Venti brewed coffee fro Starbucks has 415!   I am sorry for this woman and here son but it is a freak accident and not the fault of the energy drink. 

  • Gspuhler

    My only question is where was this mother while her daughter was drinking these drinks? Why didn’t she educate her? Why should we put this souly on the energy drink company? What about the PARENTS?

  • Skip

    Starbucks isn’t marketed to kids. Kids like soda, not coffee

  • Pingback: Senator Urges FDA to Investigate Energy Drinks – BevNET.com « News « Psychoactivity

  • GUEST

    I know a lot of kids that drink coffee!

  • Dodger

    Simple solution…  you must be 18 to purchase!  And why in the heck does Michigan allow Red Bull to be purchased on your Bridge Card (food stamps)?  That is the DUMBEST thing that I have heard of…    Nice Job Michigan!

  • Todd

    Mr. Durbin has a point here..Marketing is directed towards the youth of today. But what isn’t.. Yes energy drinks have high amounts of caffeine, Taurine, Guarana and ginseng..And consumed in REASONABLE amounts are not harmful.. No more then 8oz per day..But Companies like Red Bull, Amp (Pepsi), Monster (Hanson Beverage) etc look more for big volume sales so they produce larger sizes, 16oz (2 day Supply), and so on… Go after the companies and do not permit larger sizes. Also we have to put some of this back on parents that purchase these and all energy drinks for their kids..To drink more then 1 can a day is just asking for the heart the heart to explode..Children under the age of 18 should not be drinking these products, PERIOD! But before we throw blame, we need to look at the whole picture first. The beverage companies, government, merchants & customers need to come together and design a program that is fair to everyone..Oh and lets be sure to include beverages like 5 hour, and so on..These on shot’s are just as harmful and dangerious as the Energy Drinks and they out sell the cans and bottles by better then 10 to 1..

  • Pingback: Durbin Asks FDA to Regulate Caffeine Levels in Energy Drinks – NBC Chicago « News « Psychoactivity

  • DBK

    Having worked for an energy company for 2 years I can honestly say it is not the fault of the energy drinks, but how people view them (as a regular soda) I would never give someone under 16 an energy drink because it is recommended that you be at least 16 to consume. As for having 2 24 oz cans of Monster in a 24 hr period? thats like drinking 6 coffees in 24 hours…at 14 years old. This should never happen, people need to be mroe aware of what ingredients are in these drinks because this would give anyone a cardiac arrest.

  • Anonymous

    I know children that drink coffee as well. I started when I was twelve. Of course I hadn’t been diagnosed with a heart condition like the young lady that chose to ignore the warnings clearly printed on the Monster cans. Regarding Starbucks I found it interesting that on their new energy drink they also failed to include the warnings found on Monster, Rockstar, Amp, and others. Anyway, if someone ignores a warning clearly printed on a label do you blame the manufacturer?

  • Pingback: Google to supplement privacy policy to respect Korea's regulatory rules | Benefits of oil

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YCD7UZBKJQQ6YEY6V3IRJ3UNFA ALEX

    WHO WANTS A A CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION!
    TION!

  • Pingback: Senator Urges FDA to Investigate Energy Drinks | Energy

Have news? Have a new product? Tell us