• BevBlog

    Drops, drips, and leaks from the beverage industry.

26th September 2007

Bye Bye Bravo Brands

posted in coca-cola, Uncategorized |

According to an SEC filing on September 21, Bravo Brands has filed a voluntary petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida pursuant to Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code.   Robert C. Furr, Esq. has been appointed Trustee in this case.

ripbravo.jpgThis is the latest — and certainly most severe — bad news for Bravo.  The company has consistently been in financial trouble, citing costs of production, overhead, marketing, and slotting fees relative to the company’s low revenue (approx $14 million in 2006, $11 million in 2005, $2 million in 2004 according to SEC filings).

It all started to unravel in spring of this year, when CCE terminated the company’s distribution agreement, headcount was slashed (including CEO Roy Warren), and new management was put in place while a scramble for capital ensued.  The new team never got the funding they needed, which was certainly impacted at least somewhat by industry factors as well as the US credit crunch. 

Regardless, they’re gone now.  A couple of things about Bravo’s structure and demise are worth pointing out, especially to new and young beverage companies:

  • Being public (especially on the pink sheets) is rarely right for a beverage company.  All your dirty laundry is public — and there’s likely to be plenty of it when you’re a highly leveraged small company.  There are very few success stories for this approach.
  • Playing with the big boys (CCE in this case) is risky when you’re very little.  You’re likely to only get one shot and expectations are going to be very high.  In this case, the expected $80-$100 million in sales was nowhere near reality.
  • Beverage experience is critical, especially in the sales department.  Bravo had a lack of beverage experience at the top (Roy Warren was a stock broker of 15+ years) and, as a result, they were better at making deals in the conference room than distributing and selling their product. Eventually, they gave everything to CCE, avoiding the tried and true “up and down the street” approach followed by almost every beverage success story (e.g. Snapple, AriZona, SoBe, Glaceau, etc).
  • Licensed products let someone else control your destiny.  They might have helped Bravo get noticed, but they had no control over how the consumer feels about licensed brands such as Spiderman or Milky Way bars.  Likely they spiked and waned alongside whatever marketing efforts (e.g. Spiderman movies) the brand owner was presently running. 

Have your own thoughts on Bravo’s demise? Your comments are encouraged….

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 26th, 2007 at 9:03 am and is filed under coca-cola, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 12 responses to “Bye Bye Bravo Brands”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On September 28th, 2007, Jeffery Kaplan, Pres said:

    I have been watching this company since they launched in 2001 and knew this would happen. Reading all the SEC docs about this Pink Sheets company even before they were called Bravo, shows how the insiders who owned penny stock many tons of money while the public investors lost everything. Note there are many, many pink sheet beverage companies out there doing the same scams to the public.
    Jeff Kaplan, Pres
    Global Beverage
    www.koolcowdrinks.com

  2. 2 On October 3rd, 2007, Rick Whipple said:

    I was one of Bravo’s suppliers and share holders, losing my butt in both regards. There are a few people at Bravo that were on the up-and-up, but the rest were crooks and should be in jail. I can’t believe the SEC hasn’t looked into this fiasco. Bravo had $50,000,000 in cash in 2005 and wasted it on “essentials” like $1,000 meals, sponsoring a drag racer, and a million dollar bus. The comment above by Jeffrey Kaplan is either right on the button or a complete joke…Bravo’s CFO was a Jeffrey Kaplan. If he is the same guy, he should have been doing a lot more than watching. Maybe he did.

  3. 3 On October 3rd, 2007, John Blackington - Managing Partner said:

    Ultimately, what drove the demise of Bravo was consumer influenced more than anything else - people just didn’t find value in what they were selling. The product was poorly designed and had no consumer positioning. We have a saying that the world doesn’t need another ‘grape soda’, and they were another ‘grape soda’. It is a fate experienced by the majority of new beverage start ups. The fact that Bravo was publically traded and distributed by CCE at an early stage made them more visible than other brands. I don’t think the former influenced their demise as much as the latter did.

    I believe that the ‘public markets’ are a viable option for raising capital for some companies. The continued growing influence of the internet - real time information sharing, ease of stock trading, shareholder liquidity, etc. - will only make it attractive for more companies to go this route. There are shareholder concerns because of the potential for fraud, but they will get little focus for companies of this size. I agree with Jeff that there were troubling signs with Bravo. I think they were overly focussed on propping up their share price as opposed to building their business. (at least from this perspective)

    The fact that they were distributed by CCE was a strong factor in their failure. Emerging brands should never be on a Red or Blue truck in our opinion. They need to be in environments that can nurture them. Too many start ups dream of getting into the Coke or Pepsi system, but it is fools gold, so to speak.

    In the end, the beverage industry is alive and well. We’ll somehow survive without Bravo.

  4. 4 On October 3rd, 2007, Jim Sitter said:

    I worked for this company and the observations above are 100% dead on. There was no experience at the helm or flowing down through the ranks. Many of us tried very hard but the tools just weren’t there. My apologizes to all of you that lost money. It could have come out different with some proper planning and fore though.

  5. 5 On October 6th, 2007, cindy selinsky said:

    I was a consumer who stumbled upon Slim Slammers by accident in my local grocery store. I emptied the shelf every week. Great taste and full of calcium with low fat and calories. Then they dwindled and disappeared. With all the women I know on diets who need calcium and vitamins, if these were marketed correctly (the only time I saw or heard of them was in that one grocery store) they would have been a sure hit. I wish I could buy more… or that some other company had taken over production.

  6. 6 On October 9th, 2007, JR Williams said:

    I too was burned , mis-led and outright lied to by the folks at Bravo. Roy Warren and his executive staff should never be able to work in the industry again. They should be picking up trash beside the road in orange jumpsuits.
    I am, however, I big believer in “what goes around, comes around” and these fools will pay someday.

  7. 7 On October 10th, 2007, Z said:

    Looking back there were no surprises in the history of Bravo.
    I would like to say to all investors:
    Before blaming Bravo’s management for losing your shirts, blame YOURSELF!
    The ones who did not understand the beverage business were just gabbling the stock guided by GREED, like they have never heard of the “pump and dump” tactics.
    If there are any beverage professionals among the losers they should look for a job in other industries or retire on disability. If a company has revenue of $3 mio the first quarter and somebody believes that the same company could reach revenue of $100 mio by the end of the same year, there is something very wrong with these pros.
    CCE was the worse choice for Bravo, but Bravo paid several millions commission/finder’s fee on this deal (something for SEC to look at).
    The only beneficiary of the whole development outside of the Bravo Company is CCE.
    Some of their people learned that there is a dairy case in the supermarket.

    I still don’t get it: why a shelf stable product had to be in the dairy case only? Bravo was not able to overcome this stigma.

    As of the Jeff Kaplan’s confusion: Jeff Kaplan who wrote the first comment is not the ex CFO of Bravo. I know them both and they are not related.

  8. 8 On October 16th, 2007, Jim Spellman said:

    I believe that the Bravo failure is due to a lack of management’s balance… All deal-making and no results from trade execution. It’s a sad thing when the market cap goes high for a time and management falls into the trap of throwing all the money at biz “opportunities” thereby winding up in a one dimensional business model which is predicated on a continuing outflow of cash resources. Keeping the business simply balanced, and building it vertically is key.

    Slotting fees are always a poor choice. Retailers would go belly up without products to sell and they know it. With rare exception, succumbing to a retailer’s request for slotting payments are a sign of management’s weakness. When we create a grassroots demand, we put legs under our brand. Standing on these “legs” a brand can command retail presence everywhere. With collective wholesaler discipline, slotting will go away in one week. The retailers have cash registers. Let them make their profit there.

    The foundation of any successful beverage start-up is developed by creating demand and growing volume profitably from day one. Warren, a terrific deal-maker, did not understand the importance of having great beverage talent on board. I spoke with Roy and his people a few times in that regard and where Roy seemed to grasp reality, certain members of his team seemed better suited to guarding a hot soldering iron at a work bench than to driving the success of a blossoming beverage group. As an investing head-hunter, this just tells me to short that stock and move on to a better Client.

    Now, as for taking a beverage company public? Hansen’s is the best example of how that can work. It did not require an endless sleu of semi-synergistic acquisitions or celebrity tie-ins either! No, Hansen’s grumbled along with a relatively flat Campbell’s Soup type marketing model for a long time - maintaining a small positive cash flow year in and year out. Simultaneously they kept plugging away with innovation until Monster emerged. So, a public company works well when combined with a die-hard effort to enrich the stakeholders through vertical growth and well executed artistic innovation. Yes! It was ideas and execution that made Hansen’s succesful in the long run. Ideas and execution. There’s business art and there’s business science. Balance is the key!

    Jim Spellman
    albertjamesintl@hotmail.com

  9. 9 On October 16th, 2007, JOHN R FUGITT said:

    I too got hooked by Bravo…product wise and stock wise.

    Bravo had a really great product. Everyone liked it. Just the right price and taste. Bravo did not need to use licensed name brands to sell the stuff. All they needed was a distribution network and a conservative marketing approach. I did email Roy Warren back and forth several times. I also gave him some advice about not getting too tied up with CCE (I like coke but not their tactics). CCE used bravo and I told Mr. Warren that.

    At their peak, I gave him a way to get the product out there (if Bravo had the manufacturing capability). Lot’s of kids need something as good as Bravo. Plenty of JOB and FAMILY services agencies out there in every state in the USA. Who needs a CCE truck when the audience is right there in front of you. ( some free samples and word of mouth is all it would have taken.

    Oh well…I lost a lot. BUt I really do hope when they arise from chapter 7/11 (no pun intended), they get this great product back out there and get some real company to take them under their wing and kick them along.

    As far as CCE goes…shame on you for taking advantage and not seeing a good thing for what it was. (Bravo could have really help you while you were getting kicked out of every vending machine in every state of the nation.) Which is why coke is for adults…not for kids). Bravo was for everyone and you could have really moved ahead.

    Bravo was a breath of fresh air as I tired of Coke. Pepsi is my first choice now as far as a cola goes. Bravo was better than Nestles.

    No we don’t need another grape soda but when Grapette was around, I could not get enough of it. Many years ago. Crush was another good one. (both had the right refreshing taste.

    I don’t care about COKE’s secret formula. I like the taste but between Coke and Pepsi I liked RC cola better. Where is that today. Stodgey old conservative executives would not even drink their own product.

    Oh well, send my best to those left at BRAVO who I know could have made this company great but never had a chance because of pie-in-the-sky dreams to make money while forgetting about the customer.

    Thanks

    John

  10. 10 On October 19th, 2007, DJ Skech said:

    I like many other fell for the hype Bravo was selling. Their drinks were in fact pretty good. I got into the stock right after the CCE distribution agreement. I believed it was the thing Bravo needed. The largest distributor in the world would be getting Bravo products into the stores. I attended Bravos conference at The Roosevelt Hotel in New York in Nov. of 2005. Mr. Roy Warren painted a rosy outlook for the company. The CCE distribution agreement, the Jasper contract, the possibility of a contract with HB Hood and the potential contract with a third manufacturer of their product. Mr. Warren was leading investors to believe Bravo’s capacity constraints would be history. During Bravo’s conference call in the spring of 2006 I asked Mr. Warren why Bravo was not forthcoming with its distribution shortfall to CCE (fully knowing this 3 months earlier). Mr. Warren claimed Bravo was in fact giving timely news to investors. I asked him what had happened to the $40,000,000. cash infusion from SG Cowen about five months earlier. Mr. Warren had no answer. I asked about his “dream” that Bravo would be the “next Hanson” (Hanson stock was going for about $104. a share at the time). Again Mr. Warren had no answer. He did in fact asked me to “give him a call, so he could explain it all to me. Bravo and Mr. Warren failed because they trid to grow too fast. I guess Mr. Warren was dupped also because insider buying shows him buying shares in the mist of their plunge into the Abis. Instead of building their brand regionally they tried to grow internationally on the first shot. They should have accepted their capacity constraints, and built their brand in the southeast. When they had a lock in that area, they could have used that success and the lessons learned to succeed in the northeat and so forth and so on. They spent money on unnecessary things like drag racing. Who drinks milk at a drag race? And how many people will pay $4.00 for a chocolate milk at a Redskin football game in the middle of the winter? Now they can’t even afford to keep their website up. How bad is that? Do you mean to tell me they can’t sell enough product online or off to maintain their website? Poor business plan, bad marketing and smoke and mirrors caused the demise of Bravo brands. If anyone at Bravo reads this blog, I would like you to know I still belive in your product and its potential. If you are interested in selling the company cheap, look me up.

    Thank you,
    DJ Skech

  11. 11 On January 2nd, 2008, Anonymous said:

    I was part of the Bravo “Feet on the Street” sales force. They made some pretty poor choices and I was very angry for a while, but they sure were a great company to work for while it lasted.

  12. 12 On February 4th, 2008, Linda S said:

    ROY WARREN IS AT IT AGAIN!!!!

    A new company has been formed, with all the “usual suspects” from Bravo, with the execption of Ben Patipa. The “new” name is ATTITUDE BEVERAGES headed by Roy Warren. All the old Bravo employees are now executive VPs, and it was mentioned that Roy hopes to take this company “public”. All I can say is hold onto your wallets!!!

    Hard to believe that the laws in our country will once again let history repeat itself!

    …Someone who lost a substantial amount of money “believing” in Bravo Brands.

Leave a Reply

Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.











  ©1996-2006 BevNET.com, Inc. ( legal terms ); Web survey software ©Prezza Technologies