Energy Drink Emergency Room Visits on the Rise

As mainstream consumption of energy drinks continues to soar, emergency room visits related to energy drink intake are becoming increasingly common, according to a new report released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The report, titled “Emergency Department Visits Involving Energy Drinks,” utilizes data from SAMHSA’s 2005-2009 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN).

The report states that non-alcoholic energy drinks contributed to 13,114 emergency room visits in 2009, a dramatic and nearly tenfold increase since 2005. The reason for the majority of visits was classified as “adverse reactions” to energy drinks — although 44 percent of the visits were the result of individuals combining energy drinks with drugs or alcohol, according to the study. Overall, men aged 18-39 made up a majority of emergency room visits, and visits by men were more likely than visits by women to involve energy drinks in combination with alcohol or drugs.

“The beverage industry, consumer groups, community coalitions, the healthcare community, teachers, parents and others must get the word out that quick-fix energy drinks are not a solution and carry great risks, especially in combination with other substances of abuse,” said SAMHSA Administrator Pamela S. Hyde.

SAMHSA laid much of the blame on caffeine, a key ingredient in most energy drinks. The report indicated that while there are no established guidelines for “safe” levels of caffeine, many researchers consider 100 to 200 milligrams of caffeine per day to be moderate intake for an adult. The report noted that excessive caffeine intake can lead to a variety of health issues including hypertension, diabetes and anxiety disorders and stated that the total amount of caffeine in a can or bottle of an energy drink reached level as high as 500 milligrams, compared with about 100 mg in a five oz. cup of coffee or 50 milligrams in a 12 oz. cola.

The American Beverage Association (ABA) was not pleased with the report.

“This paper is a troubling example of statistics taken out of context,” the ABA said in a statement. “Of the more than 123 million visits made to emergency room facilities each year, less than one one-hundredth of one percent involved people who consumed energy drinks according to this report.  Even so, this report shares no information about the overall health of those who allegedly consumed energy drinks, or even what symptoms brought them to the ER in the first place.”

The ABA also stated that caffeine is a safe ingredient and has been thoroughly tested and deemed safe by the Food and Drug Administration and over 140 countries throughout the world. However, the ABA did state that over the last few years, the organization and its members have adopted several voluntary policies concerning energy drinks, specifically related to uniform labeling of ingredients and the guidelines on proper marketing of the beverages.

Brian O’Byrne, the CEO of Hydrive Energy, agreed with the ABA’s statement. He said that the report, which he called “a bit of a witchhunt,” was selective on statistics.

O’Byrne also noted that SAMHSA omitted the fact that that total consumption of energy drinks has skyrocketed over the past decade. He quoted a 2010 report titled “Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,” which stated that between 2002 and 2007, sales of energy drinks grew by 559 percent – a rate that he said was on par with the increase in emergency room visits associated with energy drink intake.

“Basically, an energy drink has less caffeine than a ‘tall’ or ‘grande’ cup of Starbucks coffee, and nobody is saying anything about that,” O’Byrne said. “Are people going to the emergency room after drinking a cup and a half of Starbucks coffee?”

 

HYDRIVE ENERGY LLC, is the manufacture and marketer of HYDRIVE Energy Drink, the first energy drink made from spring water.

Association whose members are producers, marketers and distributors of non-alcoholic beverages.

  • stu

    Wow.  Your douchey abortion rant is applicable how?  Rent-seeking?  WTF?  Please go back to the mental hospital.

  • Jeff

    Stu,

    My “douchey” rant is applicable, becuase it highlights the weaknesses of arguments against energy drinks.  So long as the ultimate “personal” choice, abortion, is legal, then calls to “ban” something as compartively begnin as energy drinks clearly will be an attemp to impose one’s genetically-predisposed communist or totalitarian leanings (check out research on the HAP map to see applicable research) or an attempt at rent-seeking.  Unfortunately, you could not be bothered to Google the term rent-seeking so you failed to understand that the SAMHSA is attempting to use regulatory authorities to invoke policies or dialogue that will financially benefit SAMHSA.  That is, they are rent-seekers.  It is similar to an employee of the FDA attempting to take action against energy drinks.  In case of the FDA employee, we could call his or her actions either bureaucratic entrepreneurialism or personal rent-seeking.  Really though, isn’t this standard dinner table talk?  The type of conversation that your mother and father engaged so that you would not grow up to be a totalitarian jerk who would seek to ban anything he didnt’ like and would instead understand the notion of the “Broken Window Fallacy” and would always walk the earth with compassion for his fellow man while honoring the Western notions of honor, logic, personal choice and personal responsibility? 

    Tis you who have the problem.  Or maybe you are just the product of a mistaken sexual encounter and should have been aborted?  After all, the SAMHSA, medical and psychological experts that they are, don’t seem to think there are any bad consequences to abortion unlike energy drinks.  So there you go: your abortion would have been neutral to, or maybe even appluaded by, SAMHSA, but if your mommy or daddy chugged three energy drinks per day, then SAMHSA would be concerned.  I am sure it’s nice to know that such an official sounding organization values your life less than an energy drink.  Of course, that is the way it always is with rent-seekers.  They care nothing for logic or morality as they make their livelihood off the backs of others. 

    BTW, since you think I am probably anti-abortion and thus, my post is a rant, I will clarify.  I am more pro-abortion than you could ever imagine.  Abortion has temporarily staved the lower class, and those people possessed of inferior genetics, as clearly indicated by measures of IQ and low time preference, from taking over.  Sure, the breeding class will ulimatey prevail in the predictable Malthusian cycle, but abortion has bought us time. 

  • Jeff

    Stu,

    My “douchey” rant is applicable, becuase it highlights the weaknesses of arguments against energy drinks.  So long as the ultimate “personal” choice, abortion, is legal, then calls to “ban” something as compartively begnin as energy drinks clearly will be an attemp to impose one’s genetically-predisposed communist or totalitarian leanings (check out research on the HAP map to see applicable research) or an attempt at rent-seeking.  Unfortunately, you could not be bothered to Google the term rent-seeking so you failed to understand that the SAMHSA is attempting to use regulatory authorities to invoke policies or dialogue that will financially benefit SAMHSA.  That is, they are rent-seekers.  It is similar to an employee of the FDA attempting to take action against energy drinks.  In case of the FDA employee, we could call his or her actions either bureaucratic entrepreneurialism or personal rent-seeking.  Really though, isn’t this standard dinner table talk?  The type of conversation that your mother and father engaged so that you would not grow up to be a totalitarian jerk who would seek to ban anything he didnt’ like and would instead understand the notion of the “Broken Window Fallacy” and would always walk the earth with compassion for his fellow man while honoring the Western notions of honor, logic, personal choice and personal responsibility? 

    Tis you who have the problem.  Or maybe you are just the product of a mistaken sexual encounter and should have been aborted?  After all, the SAMHSA, medical and psychological experts that they are, don’t seem to think there are any bad consequences to abortion unlike energy drinks.  So there you go: your abortion would have been neutral to, or maybe even appluaded by, SAMHSA, but if your mommy or daddy chugged three energy drinks per day, then SAMHSA would be concerned.  I am sure it’s nice to know that such an official sounding organization values your life less than an energy drink.  Of course, that is the way it always is with rent-seekers.  They care nothing for logic or morality as they make their livelihood off the backs of others. 

    BTW, since you think I am probably anti-abortion and thus, my post is a rant, I will clarify.  I am more pro-abortion than you could ever imagine.  Abortion has temporarily staved the lower class, and those people possessed of inferior genetics, as clearly indicated by measures of IQ and low time preference, from taking over.  Sure, the breeding class will ulimatey prevail in the predictable Malthusian cycle, but abortion has bought us time. 

  • Cloudchaser

    “But I suppose few people know what rent-seeking is so down the road to communism we go. ”

    Well, as long as you found a way to feel superior on the internet, anonymously, that’s all that’s important.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rubs-MassageMiami/100003166722885 Rubs MassageMiami

    Whenever I take a product that has caffeine in it over a period of time, my tolerance level increases. I am sure I’m not the only one that has that problem. I just discovered a product called revamp that actually REDUCES your tolerance level to caffeine.  It’s just amazing and it really works!  I found an in depth youtube product review on it. You can find the revamp product review here: http://www.career-job-search.info

  • Pingback: American Beverage Association on DAWN Report: “Don’t Believe the Hype” : BevNET.com : BevNET.com

Have news? Have a new product? Tell us