Lawsuit Calls Simply Orange “Misleading”

It turns out that even beverage giants aren’t immune from the recent outbreak of lawsuits infecting the industry. Earlier this week, the JD Journal reported that Coca-Cola was hit with a lawsuit claiming that the name and marketing of the company’s Simply Orange brand are misleading. The suit, filed in an Illinois federal court last Friday, contends that the beverage is not simple orange juice; rather, it is juice that is heavily processed and contains added flavorings and constituents to change its color, consistency, taste, and aroma.

In the lawsuit, plaintiff Randall Davis states that chemically engineered “flavor packs” are added to Simply Orange, yet consumers pay a premium for the product based on their belief that the juice fresh and untainted by artificial ingredients. The lawsuit claims “Coca-Cola misrepresented that Simply Orange was 100% pure and natural orange juice when in fact it was not.”

Davis is accusing Coke of fraud and misrepresentation and pursuing class-action status.

In response to media inquiries about the lawsuit, Coca-Cola spokeswoman Susan Stribling  stated, “This lawsuit has nothing to do with misleading consumers and everything to do with lining class action lawyers’ pockets … it is a meritless case against which we will vigorously defend ourselves.”

  • Pingback: Simple Detox @ Satya-Ayurveda Four Goals of Ayurvedic Life

  • Fortxx

    It is nothing new, big companies mislead consumers. if class action lawyers are making $$ due to companies misleading consumers then more $$ to them. If the product as advertised then product has nothing to worry about. However I am finding class action lawyers are getting better at their game. Not bringing these suits unless they have merit. We need this kind of protection from big and companies. Because we know companies will and do take advantage of the consumer not knowing the facts.

  • Anonymous

    fortxx, i couldn’t have said it better myself. thank you. continuing to allow businesses to mislead and misrepresent isn’t “pro-growth” and “pro-jobs” policy this country should embrace – it’s fraud.

  • Sad you think it

    Seriously?  Who is hurt by this?  If you like the product better than other options and it provides you value, you will buy it.  If not you won’t part with your dollars.  Everyone can read the ingredient statement and know what they’re getting.  No one is being protected by this…its all about greedy lawyers.

  • The Juice

    As much as I think the Coca Cola Company is evil and ought to be exposed for other issues, like what they know about HFCS, they are perfectly within the written regs for declarations. Any issue with these flavor pacs needs to be taken up with the FDA. All the flavors that they put in these pacs occur naturally in an orange and thus are considered by reg to be part of the juice. Odwalla’s problems before Coke owned them killed the fresh juice industry requiring aseptic storage of not from concentrate as the demand for frozen concentrate waned. Aseptic storage comes at a price of oranoleptic degradation so the need to enhance flavor is mandatory for the product to taste any good. Just my $.02 worth but Trop and Coke is not the problem here.

  • Pingback: Judge Tosses Out “All-Natural” Lawsuit Against AriZona : BevNET.com : BevNET.com

Have news? Have a new product? Tell us